- U569 Modern Inner Mongolia
- Lecture, Tuesday, Week 7
- Nationalism: Theories and application in Inner Mongolia
- Inner Mongolia as a special case: theories focus on IM's
peculiarities
- Rational-Response theory: Chinese/gov't awful, so Mongols
resist
- Most popular theory among Mongols
- But we have to define what is the standard for
"awful"
- Nomad/sedentary theory: farmers take nomadic pastoralist
land
- Explains some facts, but by no means all
- Ethno-legal theory: IM subject to Manchus, so free when
Manchus fall
- Widely repeated in Inner Mongolia
- Khalkha declares independence Nov. 1911, Manchus fall Feb.
1912
- Manchu rule was not conditional on oath or policy
- Illustrates policy of East (inner ) Mongolian nobility
- All assume Inner Mongolia is not like other areas of nationalist
issues
- Modernization Theory: Nationalism is pre-modern survival
- Nationalism: non-rational commitment, declines with
modernization
- Problem: definitely does not track the facts
- Nationalism as Modern (Marxism, Hobsbawm, Gellner, Anderson)
- Nationalism>response to the "great transition":
pre-modern to modern
- Premodern society ("Ruritania")
- Non-national empires, cosmopolitan nobles/church, one literary
lang.
- Parochial peasantry, local identities, innumerable dialects
- Great transition: urbanization, education, literacy,
secularization, middle class
- Nationalism's role in modern society
- "Mobilized" (displaced) peasants seek association,
status, advance
- Nationalism prevents assimilation as depressed underclass
- Nations not revived, but "invented" in modernization
- Horowitz and Extinction Anxiety Theory
- Behavior and images in ethnic conflict center on: advanced
vs. backwards
- Stereotypes consensual and not related to power dichotomy
- Backward: honest, slow, shy, polite, lazy, religious,
disunified, verbal
- Resource rich; military (esp. army), land-holding
- Advanced: clever, aggressive, rude, materialist,
competitive, mathematical
- Resource poor > mobile; commerce, science, civil service
- As colony, backward has role, but not in modern society
- Independence threatens permanent inferiority for backward groups
- Ultimate backward group fear is extinction ("like
Indians")
- New Policies, 1911 Revolution and the responses in Inner Mongolia
- Princes reject it, seek to preserve Qing order >> Secession
- Anti-Chinese riots in Da Khüriye ("Urga"); riot greeted
Sando (1905)
- Lamas usually leaders
- Nobility, with Jebdzundamba Khutugtu move for independence
- 1900 (Boxers) appeals to Russia for intervention
- Alternate center to Beijing, annual and triennial meetings
- Nov., 1911, declares independence, Jkh as Bogd Khaan
- Jan., 1912 joined by Hulun Buir
- 1912-1913: Jkh calls on Inner Mongolian princes to join
- Majority of nobility, yamens support union (SE IM doesn't)
- Khalkha launches war to occupy IM, successful
- Diplomacy of the "Mongolian Questions"
- China's territory guaranteed (Open Door, treaty system)
- Russia receives privileges, but can't annex
- Kiakhta treaty system (Inner Mongolia not allowed), 1915
- Where princes coopted, plebeian opposition >> duguilangs
- Accept New Policies, emulate them locally
- Concentrated in SE Inner Mongolia (Josotu, Kheshigten, Left
Khorchin)
- Kharachin Right's Prince Güngsangnorbu
- Banner income: mines, land leases, investments
- Banner sponsors schools (boys & girls), mines, policies,
study abroad
- Similar ideas spread in Chakhar, Daur, and Höhhot Tümeds
- East Mongolian "enlightenment"
- Mongolia backward compared to China
- Fervent belief in science and education (new schools movement)
- Curriculum: Mongolian and Chinese, math, science
- Rejection of Buddhism (partial or complete)
- Racial survival more important than cultural continuity
- Admiration of Injannashi
- They reject Khalkha independence due to Buddhist influence
- Go further: strengthen powers and social insulation of
the state
- Agenda of revolution