|
 |
College of Arts and Sciences Policy Committee Minutes
April 27, 2006
[Note: A proposed revision of a CPC Policy is located at the end of these minutes.]
Present: Judith Anderson (chair), Bob Becker, Sandra Dolby, Hal Evans (substituting for Rick Van Kooten next year), Roger Levesque, Rosemary Lloyd, Al Ruesink (recorder), and Rob Shakespeare.
The meeting convened at 4:18.
Minutes of April 20 were approved as submitted. (Wow, no niggling for the second week in a row!)
We agreed to continue meeting on Thursdays through May, with a special meeting planned on Wednesday, May 3rd to discuss campus building planning with Interim Provost McRobbie.
Transition team leader David Zaret joined us at 4:33. First he briefed us on the dean search. A first round of screening interviews has been completed and the CPC will meet with candidates when they come to campus for the next round of interviews. Conversation then ranged widely over General Ed requirements (to be considered further in the fall), evaluation of the need for a printed schedule of classes, data discrepancies on the number of faculty in some units with release time from teaching, and level of dollar support provided to departments by the College or OVPR (Office of Vice President for Research) to provide course coverage when regular faculty have course releases. David left at 5:01.
At 5:02 we were joined by Tom Gieryn, whose past experiences include work on the campus Capital Priorities Committee, chair of the CPC, and chair of the Planning Committee that drafted a proposal for an Arts and Humanities classroom and office building, which was submitted to Swamy in July, 2005. We had asked him to brief us on some history of building planning for IUB. He noted that three different buildings have been involved: 1) a UITS building that was originally sited near the Ed School on 7th Street and now is to be located just north of 10th Street where there is a parking lot (now called the CIB building--Computation and Information Bldg.) 2) a pod of classrooms that was to go between the main library and Radio and TV, and 3) a Humanities building whose site may have been on 7th Street across from Ernie Pyle Hall. The classroom building seems to have fallen off the priorities list, in part because there is disagreement about the need for more classrooms, especially rooms as large as those planned for this building. The priority of the Humanities building has vanished, with the reason unclear. And the CIB building has gone from being proposed as a project requiring no state funds to being at the top of the list requesting state funds. Tom helped us understand that the Capital Priorities Committee for IUB, chaired by Neil Theobald, is responsible for 1) setting priorities for new construction and for the use of campus R&R funds, and 2) periodically reviewing the campus master plan (by architect firm of John Bell). We plan to consult with current faculty members on the Capital Priorities Committee before meeting with Provost McRobbie on May 3. Our concern is that some major priority decisions may have been made without adequate faculty consultation. Tom left the meeting at 5:53.
Bob Becker announced that this will be his last meeting as a member of the CPC because he will soon be increasing his involvement in the College deanery and would thus have a conflict of interest. His CPC colleagues asked that we record in the minutes "extremely effusive thanks" for the work that he has done with us. That means that we have really appreciated his wisdom, his background knowledge, his thoughtful comments, and his willingness to work tirelessly for the CPC.
The meeting adjourned at 6:02.
Albert Ruesink, recorder
Questions or comments regarding the minutes and actions of the College Policy Committee may be addressed to co-chairs Judith Anderson (anders@indiana.edu --855-3845) and Bob Becker (becker@indiana.edu
--855-3014). Past minutes and College Policy Statements can be found
at the CPC web page: www.indiana.edu/~college/faculty/policy/policies.shtml.
Policy Document
The following document represents a draft revision of a CPC Policy Document of recent years. The CPC worked on it, submitted it to Dean Swamy and transition team leader Zaret for suggestions, and now circulates it for faculty comments. For the original version, see the CPC Policy Document site:
http://www.indiana.edu/~college/faculty/policy/policies.shtml.
Responses about the document should be sent to Judith Anderson (anders@indiana.edu), our CPC chair.
Policy on Expectations of Faculty When on Release Time from Teaching (April 18, 2003; revised May, 2006) This statement expands on policy titled "Policy on Expectations of Tenured Faculty (January 12, 1995)." Ten-month faculty appointments carry with them the expectation that faculty will sustain their teaching, administrative, undergraduate advising, graduate advising, service, and other faculty duties throughout the fall and spring semesters. Faculty who receive administrative teaching relief, who teach 8-week courses, who have internal grants (such as a CAHI fellowship or New Frontiers grant), or who have accumulated release time from teaching (for instance, by "banking" courses) are expected to maintain, without interruption, their obligations in these other areas.
That is, unless on funded research leave, Leave Without Pay, or sabbatical, faculty who are not engaged in teaching courses are expected to maintain a presence on campus in order to perform their other faculty duties. Those faculty who wish to be absent from campus for prolonged periods and therefore unavailable for normal service and administrative duties must receive written approval from their unit chair and the dean of the College. Approval will be given only if the chair and the dean determine that the faculty member's extended absence from campus is in the context of advancing the mission of the campus and that the individual's non-teaching duties can be covered by qualified others.
|